Let's write something worthwhile.
My current delight right now is thinking about Els. She is having a cognitive dissonance right now.
Frankly speaking she is not that unique at all.
This model still applies:
I say she is at the Experiment Stage. Hence I got to develop her capability.
What is the model to use?
Also we can combine these two models with DISC Personality Model:
This is my Danish Gambit for Monday: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5411cS2P43E
If Friday I started with a Queen Gambit. Today I start with a Danish Gambit. I think you like it better.
Let's write to Els.
Of sugar and spice and everything nice
My darling baby,
I am in such a *[good] high spirit tonight. It's Saturday eve, the time I normally listen to Sound Journey and the weather is just great. So I thought, why not drop Els a line?
* Thanks Sarah. You had been an angel baby.
It seems that you do read my emails. That's a relief to know. I do make real effort to write to you. My philosophy is if it is worthy an effort might as well make it your best effort. You get what I'm saying?
I noticed that like me, you have a believing mind honey. That means when you read something, that particular moment you are completely immersed in whatever you read. No wonder you are so into Harry Potter novels. You live in the moment. You become part of the story. I am not surprised if you have a character you associate with when you read these stories.
In the DISC Personality Model, you are skewed toward the Influence type. If you haven't taken this test yet try taking one. You will learn so much about who you really are. You are not an oddball baby, you are among the few that fall in this category.
The majority will fall in the Steadiness type like KG. A few will be the Dominance type like Aush.
Guess where do I belong? I am the Conscientious type. *[So we are complementary]. Therefore our personalities are complementary. I am attracted to you because you are my opposite. That is why I never get enough of you. You make me laugh, you goofy chick LOL.
* Wow, what's the odds of that?
Now, taking it to the next step, I am implementing the Kubler-Ross Change Model with you. I'm not going to tell you where in the *cur[s]e (curve) you are at but from the way I write this email, you can more or less guess where you are at.
* Awww come on Sarah, it's not that bad.... OK fine, if you say so. Els, you are at the Experiment Stage.
This is not the first time I use the Kubler-Ross Model on you. In 2018, I used the Grief Cycle.
Now darling, the love of my life. I am doing this because I see so much potential in you. I cannot help but feel the pain you were suffering. I am a people specialist. I study people and their behavior so that they can perform at the optimum level. You honey, have a great potential ahead of you. It will be a crying shame if you don't rise to your full potential.
People like you will hit the brick wall and the glass ceiling because you are a high achiever. You have a high expectation in life. I bet you are now thinking about what challenge for you to conquer next. That is your nature.
I want you to embrace this notion so that you will be more resilient in the future.
It's 10 minutes to 4:00 am. Time for me to sleep. In summary, I want you to be happy. Not the neck up eyes closed happy. Rather I want you to experience the neck down eyes open happiness. This is the happiness that is endearing and consistent. We try to avoid the fleeting type of happiness.
Baby, I'm not a mind reader. It so happens I study human behavior. You have the resources within you as well. Just like the Subtle Art of not Giving a F*ck, happiness is not about putting a happy face. Same thing, Mark Manson mentioned that not giving a fuck is not about being indifferent. It's two sides of the same coin. Happiness is about tapping the resources within you.
I love you so much Els. I do sincerely want you to be happy.
Love you always.
Sine cera,
SJ
18/7/20
-------------------------
I wrote some observations I made about you in the email. Nothing much really... Just my professional note on what I see.
No comments:
Post a Comment